Wednesday, 18 November 2020

Latest Breaking News Daily: South surrey Cannabis 604-849-3905 delivery or pi...

Latest Breaking News Daily: South surrey Cannabis 604-849-3905 delivery or pi...:                                  South Surrey Cannabis 604-849-3905  

South surrey Cannabis 604-849-3905 delivery or pickup

                                 South Surrey Cannabis 604-849-3905  Delivery or Pickup














Medical Cannabis Dispensary

                                                        South Surrey Cannabis Shop                                                                                                                                Always Open

ADDITIONAL CONTACT INFO
About
We are your one stop source for all the most popular marijuana products and brands available in BC. Our staff have over 10 years of experience in the medical marijuana field so please feel free to ask us any questions you may have.
Products
We are your one stop source for all the most popular marijuana products and brands available in BC. Our staff have over 10 years of experience in the medical marijuana field so please feel free to ask us any questions you may have.
Signup Now

High Quality No Medical Card Needed

We are constantly adding to our collection the latest high quality strains and selection of different products for all of your needs.Compassionate, friendly and knowledgeable customer service

We take pride in our ability to provide the best customer service in the industry and to let our customers know that we care.Fast, secure and discreet delivery

                                        https://www.facebook.com/SouthSurreyherbalSupply

                                      South Surrey Cannabis Shop - Cannabis Shop in Surrey

                                              South Surrey Cannabis Shop - Google Maps

                                              South Surrey Cannabis Shop - Google Search


Always New products in stock At South Surrey Cannabis Shop call 604-849-3905 for delivery or pickup in South surrey B.C.


Friday, 5 January 2018

Radiological Water Filtration

Amazon.com: $averPak 2 Pack - Includes 2 Seychelle 28oz Flip Top Water Filtration Bottles with the Seychell EXTREME RAD/ADV Filters and 2 Additional Spare EXTREME RAD/ADV Filters: Sports & Outdoors:

Radiological Water Filtration

  • Includes 2 - 28oz Flip Top Water Filtration Bottles wth the Seychell EXTREME Filters and 2 Additional Spare EXTREME Filters.
  • EXTREME Filter Inludes an iodinated resin and has been proven effective in the removal of bacteria and viruses to six logs (99.9999%). Plus it removes up to 99.99% of Radiological Contaminants such as Gross Beta, Radon 222, Alpha Radium 226, Plutonium, Uranium, Cesium 134 and 137. It can be used in extreme conditions, including for turbid and stagnant water and is ideal when using water of an unknown quality
  • Also removes up to 99.99% of contaminants and pollutants found in fresh water supplies including Aesthetics such as chlorine, Sediment and dirt; Chemicals (VOC's) such as DDT, MTBE, Benzene, Chloroforms (THM's); Dissolved Solids (heavy metals) such as Arsenic, Lead, Mercury, Copper, Zinc, Aluminum, Chromium 6 and up to 99.9% of Biologicals (pathogens) such as Giardia and Cryptospo
  • Great for travel & emergency preparedness. Made entirely from FDA Approved Plastics that are BPA Free and Will Not Leach. Easy to replace & exchange Filters and bottles work with every applicable filter type. Filters Include: REGULAR, STANDARD, ALKALINE, ADVANCED, & EXTREME
  • Reference Filter Chart and the Product Description below for more details
Buy $averPak 2 Pack - Includes 2 Seychelle 28oz Flip Top Water Filtration Bottles with the Seychell EXTREME RAD/ADV Filters and 2 Additional Spare EXTREME RAD/ADV Filters: Serveware - Amazon.com ✓ FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible purchases

Monday, 13 May 2013

Latest Solar Flare Activity: Solar flare Activity 13 May 2013

Latest Solar Flare Activity: Solar flare Activity 13 May 2013: Solar flare Activity 13 May 2013 Another major X-Class solar flare, this time peaking at X2.8 was observed at 16:05 UTC. Another St...

Tuesday, 22 May 2012

Medical Center and Hospital Radiation Exposure, Renewed Concerns - Health

Various recently published studies about the relationship between low dose radiation and cancer fanned again the discussion about risk and benefits of modern diagnostic techniques and in particular Computer Tomography (CT). According to an article recently published in IMAGE (Marie H. Meynadier, Vol. 21, no. 10 - March 10, 2008), it is predictable that in a few decades up to 2 percent of cancers in the United States could be linked to the administration of diagnostic x-rays, even if the ability to monitor the increase in cancer related to radiation exposure will be very difficult as radiation-induced cancer can take up to 20 years to develop.

Since many years the relationship between cancer development and radiation exposure has been studied and there are hundreds if not thousands of publications related to this topic. The problem is that a third of all people get cancer anyway, at some time in their lives, and hence it is quite difficult to find evidence that low doses of radiation cause cancers that would not have otherwise occurred. Even for the 80,000 to 90,000 survivors of the atomic bombs exploded over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, exposed to very large radiation doses, it has been hard to find a direct relationship between excess cancer development and radiation exposure. According to Japanese statistics, from the people who were exposed in 1945 (and did not die immediately) nearly half are still alive. A statistically significant increase in cancer was found at relatively high exposure level of 50 millisieverts (mSv is the unit commonly used to measure the effective dose in diagnostic medical procedures), whi ch is about 16 times the current annual average for Americans from medical exams and about 21 times above the average natural background effective dose in the USA. But these numbers need to be analyzed with care. There is a controversy between scientists if levels below 50 mSv can be considered as safe and about the real (and statistically proven) rest-risk of low radiation exposure.

The most widely used mathematical model in estimating radiation risk is known as the linear-nonthreshold dose-respond model. This model assumes that there is no safe dose of radiation and that there is a linear and direct relation between cancer risk and genetic damage with radiation exposure. But this model is in discussion since a long time. For some scientists the linear model is the best way to estimate radiation risk, but for others there exist a threshold below which radiation poses no hazard to health.

It is not difficult to identify the most important sources of man-made or anthropogenic radiation. Most of the collective dose from diagnostic radiology comes from procedures such as CT, interventional radiology and barium enemas. Advances in radiological diagnostic technology have radically transformed medical practice in recent years and there has been a rapid increase particularly in the application of CT. Effective dose estimates of CT scans and nuclear medicine studies are in the range of 10 to 25 mSv for a single study, which is about 100 times larger than those from conventional radiological procedures such as chest x-rays. Although CT scanners contribute to only 12 percent of all medical radiation procedures, the number of CT scans is on the rise. In the United States for instance, no more than 3 million studies using CT were performed in 1980 and in 2006 this number was already above 60 million. Overall, the mean effective dose in the US from all medical x-rays ha s increased about seven-fold over this period and the situation in Europe is not very different. There are several scientific studies proving a relationship between small radiation doses and cancer formation.

One of these studies, already published in the year 2000 (Spine, Morin Doody et al, Volume 25(16) August 15, 2000), was conducted with 5,573 females aged 20 and younger from 14 orthopedic medical centers in the United States who had been diagnosed with scoliosis between 1912 and 1965. Scoliosis is a medical condition in which a person's spine is curved from side to side, and may also be rotated. The goal of the study was to evaluate breast cancer mortality patterns among women with scoliosis and the risks associated with diagnostic radiographic exposure. Doody and coworkers showed that exposure to multiple diagnostic radiographic examinations during childhood and adolescence may increase the risk of breast cancer among women with scoliosis. Even if this study addresses radiology exams taken on older technology, the issue is still relevant, as scoliosis patients usually receive repeated radiographic exams and CT scans for therapy and treatment. As scoliosis generally is dia gnosed even before adolescence, these susceptible young patients are already exposed to relatively high radiation doses during their growth period. As discussed in an other recently published study (Hall et al., British Journal of Radiology 81, 362-378, 2008), the relevant organ doses during CT scans are in the range for which there is now direct credible epidemiological evidence of an excess risk of cancer, without the need to extrapolate risks from higher doses. However, even for high-dose radiological procedures, the risk to the individual patient is small, so that the benefit/risk balance is generally in the patients' favour. Concerns arise when CT examinations are used without a proven clinical rationale, when alternative modalities could be used with equal efficacy, or when CT scans are repeated unnecessarily. According to this study, it is assumed that about one-third of all CT performed in the US could be avoided using alternative diagnostic tools. According to Hall, "at this time, the benefit/risk balance for any of the commonly suggested CT screening techniques has yet to be established."





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Monday, 21 May 2012

What to Do When You Come Across Nuclear Radiation - Health - Wellness

Recently, nuclear reactor accident occurred in Japan and triggered the nuclear radiation problem. So, how to prevent it? Here I will summarize several treatments and key points so that we can minimum the harm when disaster occurs.

Once the accident occurs, the public must try to get as much information as possible to know the governments decision and notice. Thus, people should keep communication with local government via various methods such as television, radio and telephone. Do not believe in rumors. The second thing is to take necessary self-protection measures immediately according to the information of local government. According to the arrangements of local government, people evacuate the place in an organized and orderly way to avoid the serious negative effects the withdrawal brings.

Select nearby buildings to hide and reduce the direct external exposure and inhalation of air pollution. Close doors, windows and ventilation equipment including air conditioners and fans. When air pollution is over, open the windows and doors and ventilation devices quickly.

Take shielding measures. Add a layer of radiation shielding material that is thick enough between the people and radiation source to reduce the external exposure dose. Main materials are lead, reinforced concrete and water. The buildings we live in are good shields to external radiation. When it is judged that a radiological dispersal event occurs, people should try to hide in the direction toward side of the wind and enter into the building quickly.

Use wet towel and cloth to cover your nose and mouth to protect the respiratory tract. If you suspect that the surface of the body is polluted by radioactive contamination, you can have a bath and change clothes to reduce the pollution. Follow the arrangement of the local authorities and decide whether to control the usage of local food and water.

Whats more, if the nuclear and radiological terrorism events occur, the public should pay special attention to maintaining a stable state of mind and do not fear.





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software

Sunday, 20 May 2012

Despite Improving Situation in Japan, Still Risk of Radiation Exposure - Health - Diseases and Conditions

The nuclear crisis in Japan may be slowly improving, but we are not completely out of the clear when it comes to radiation exposure. Despite assurances by the U.S. government that there is no real risk of radiation exposure here in North America, fears are continuing to rise over the potential clouds of radioactive fallout (radioactive isotopes) that may travel via jet stream winds and contaminate local areas, especially on the West Coast.

Could this really happen? While this is a tough question which experts and authorities are undoubtedly grappling with by the minute, the general answer is yes. If explosions from the damaged nuclear plants in Japan propel radioactive materials into the upper atmosphere, jet stream winds can carry them far and wide, causing cumulative repercussions across the globe. Adding to the anxiety is the general sense that accurate information regarding the severity of this devastating crisis is being kept from the general public, both here and in Japan, to prevent widespread panic.

As a result, weve seen an enormous demand for the supplement potassium iodine to help protect against radiation exposure, and many West Coast suppliers are now completely out of stock. However, this supplement is not a cure all for radiation-related illnesses, and only protects from thyroid cancer by preventing the thyroid the organ most vulnerable to radiation from absorbing radioactive iodine, called iodine-131. The radioactive isotope Cesium-134 has also been leaking from the Japanese reactors in addition to iodine -131, and there is reason to believe that other radioactive isotopes such as Strontium-90 are leaking into the atmosphere as well.

It is very important to note that successful thyroid protection with potassium iodine is extremely dependant on timing with regards to such radiation exposure, and even still, will not protect against these other radioactive isotopes. It can also pose problems for people with thyroid issues. Nevertheless, potassium iodine can be an important preventative in this case, but other supplements and foods which are known to remove radioactive isotopes from the body and protect against DNA mutation must be taken as well if the risk of exposure is indeed real.

Dangers of Radiation ExposureRadioactive isotope particles, including Iodine-131, Cesium-134, Strontium-90 and others which are present in radioactive fallout, can be inhaled, ingested through radiation-contaminated food and water, and/or deposited onto the skin. Radioactive particles are particularly damaging to DNA, and can easily cause mutations which eventually lead to cancer, birth defects, cardiovascular disease and other life threatening health problems.

There are many short term health effects caused by significant exposure as well. Acutely, radioactive isotopes are most damaging to rapidly dividing cells such as those in the intestinal lining, bone marrow, hair and skin, and can cause severe gastrointestinal problems, skin problems, loss of immune and blood cells, hair loss, fatigue, and central nervous damage soon after exposure, depending on the severity. Children are at the highest risk because their cells divide more rapidly than adults.

Hope For The Best But Prepare To Protect Our HealthIt is our hope and prayer that an acute level of exposure, such as what happened with the Chernobyl meltdown, does not occur again in the world. But as Japans crisis has pointed out so gravely, we unfortunately live in a nuclear age and therefore need to be prepared to protect ourselves from the related risks if we are going to continue to use this volatile and dangerous source of energy.

As a doctor and researcher, I have always been deeply concerned about the health effects of living with nuclear energy. In fact, it was the tragedy of Chernobyl and the subsequent use of pectins to reduce radioactive levels in child victims of this disaster which prompted my original research into the use of modified citrus pectin to chelate radioactive particles and heavy metals. For more valuable health information, visit





iAutoblog the premier autoblogger software